Dec 17, 2019 You can specify the cmt as a Symbol and not just a number (see below, cmt =:a1).This allows you to keep the ordering of the @dyanmics independent of the cmt numbering. Using your model above, I added the following lines of code (note the dose and covariate values are arbitrary numbers). For sparse matrices, the PEXSI method can be more efficient than the widely used Diagonalization method for evaluating matrix functions, especially when a relatively large number of eigenpairs are needed to be computed in the diagonalization method. PEXSI can also be used to compute the matrix functions associated with generalized eigenvalue problems, i.e. Current release 4.8.5.147. Use latest Forge getValuesCollection instead of getValues (#1113) Depend on latest Forge version to allow JEI to crash properly. The Plugin Browser by The Dwarf Horde This is an official continuation of the excellent Plugin Browser originally put together by @TechnoRobbo, @Red ochre, @BoltBait, and @Ego Eram Reputo. Spoiler Changelog v1.3.0.2 - Fixed: Fixed reported crashes v1.3.0.1 - Fixed: The Author and the Alphabetical. Note: this page uses turtle for clarify and readability, but there is no requirement or expectation that turtle should be used in preference to other syntaxes. Note that production turtle instances would not be laid out so clearly either. The database format in v1.2.0 is not compatible with previous versions of the software. This only affects downgrades as users upgrading from previous versions will see a one time database migration. Once this migration has been completed, it will no longer be possible to downgrade to a previous version of the software without having to delete the. (TODO: clarify) effectindices (tupleint or tuplestr) – Indices of nodes in the effect system. (TODO: clarify) Keyword Arguments. Noisebackground (bool) – If True, background conditions are noised instead of frozen. Nodeindices¶ The indices of the nodes in the system. Tupleint network¶ The network the system belongs to.
Release notes for version 1.2.0 of the CDR Standards.
This version of the standards is considered to be the binding baseline for the Phase 2 implementation of the Consumer Data Right regime currently targeted for July 2020.
High Level Standards
| Change | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Binding Statement | Modified the introduction section to include a statement of binding that is aligned to the legal framework for the CDR regime | Introduction |
| Clarification of DateTimeString | Change to the description of the DateTimeString type to clarify the baselining of time to UTC. This is a clarification only and does not materially change the standards | Common Types Section |
Clarify V1.2.0 In Hindi
API End Points
No Change
Clarify V1.2.0 Color
Information Security Profile
| Change | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Concurrent Consent Decision | Incorporated the changes articulated in Decision 85 regarding concurrent consent | Consent Section |
| Client Registration Discovery | Added the requirement that the client registration end point be included in the OIDC discovery response | Security End Points Section |
| Security TLS Certificate | The constraint that security end points requiring TLS only must use a certificate obtained from the CDR CA has been removed | Security End Points Section |
Consumer Experience
Clarify V1.2.0 In Spanish
| Change | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Defect: Data cluster language for basic scope | CX Standards: minor defect correction for location of ‘balances’. 'Account name and type' now changed to 'Account name, type and balance'. 'Account numbers, balances and features' now changed to 'Account numbers and features'. | CX Standards Page 21: Data Standards Language |
| Single/Concurrent consent guideline | CX Guidelines: example for ADRs to present withdrawal election prior to establishing a new consent. | CX Guidelines Page 64: Subsequent Consent |
| Rule 4.23(b) example: historical data | CX Guidelines: showing how DHs may present static ‘1 Jan 2017’ reference in authorisation flow to reflect rule 4.23(b). CX Guidelines now also suggest other locations for this information that are not required in the rules or standards. | CX Guidelines Page 82: Authorise / Confirmation Page 96: ADR dashboard Page 108: DH Dashboard |
| Rule 7.4 and 7.9 example: compliance with Privacy Safeguards 5 and 10 | CX Guidelines: example for privacy safeguard requirement on dashboards. Rules regarding disclosure of datasets, references to ADRs and DHs, and date of initial and final disclosure. | CX Guidelines Page 96: ADR dashboard Page 108: DH dashboard |
| CDR Branding | CX Guidelines: official CDR branding included in screens that refer to accreditation, with reference to ACCC-supplied assets. | CX Guidelines Pages 10, 37, 39, 77, 110 |
| Accreditation check | CX Guidelines: statement regarding ACCC-provided URL for consumers to use to verify accreditation | CX Guidelines Page 39, 111 |
| Password copy | CX Guidelines: clarified example of copy regarding CDR participants never asking for consumer passwords. Presented in body copy and footer. | CX Guidelines Pages 71 - 75 |
| CDR Rule 7.12(2)(b) | CX Guidelines: inclusion of rule in reference to outsourced providers. | CX Guidelines Page 58, 62 |
| Design patterns | CX Guidelines: guideline on encouraging consumers to be privacy conscious. | CX Guidelines Page 53, 95, 108 |
| Rules references | CX Guidelines: amended rules references. | CX Guidelines Pages 40, 58, 98, 99, 107 |
| CDR Receipt: Rule 4.18 | CX Guidelines: copy updated to clarify that ADRs may but are not required to provide a CDR receipt on the consumer dashboard. | CX Guidelines Page 94 |